The Energy Device, from KK Energy, features a 850mah battery capable of fast charging very rapidly via USB-Type C port. The Energy Disposable also has adjustable airflow (valve located on the bottom), a 1.2 ohm Mesh coil, 5% Salt Nicotine, and huge 12ml capacity. The packaging states designed in the USA, but in all of Asias' infinite wisdom, they chose to name this product quite simply: KK Energy Disposable Device. However, they did check all the boxes by making it with a mesh coil, rechargeable, airflow adjustable, great flavors, and a very reasonable price point. The Energy device also has a unique shape in that it's rectangular but with rounded corners so it's comfortable to hold but won't roll away when set down.
1 x KK Energy Disposable 5000 Puff Rechargeable Mesh Coil Vape
Here's a full KK Energy Disposable Vape Flavor List:
kk energy vape.energy 5000puffs,energy vape 5000 puff,energy disposable vape 5000 puffs,kk energy 5000 Puffs Shenzhen Ousida Technology Co., Ltd , https://www.osdvape.com
1. The three-in-one full-screen viewing angle is larger than the three-in-one, and the three-in-one surface can be treated with light diffuse reflection. The effect obtained is not granular, and the uniformity is better than that of the three spells.
2, from the color point of view, three-in-one full color splitting color separation is easier than three spells, and the color saturation is high.
3, three-in-one is to use the entire surface to illuminate, and the three spells are limited to the point of light, so the overall color of the three-in-one is more uniform than the three.
4. Three-in-one is better than three-in-one in terms of overall flatness.
5, three spells and one three-in-one maintenance costs are low, single lamp maintenance, maintenance is simple.
6. Three spells and one power supply are separated by three points. The power consumption is small, the heat dissipation is fast, the life of the screen is effectively extended, and the reliability is high.
7. The temperature of the IC and the driver chip of the three-in-one is lower than that of the three-in-one, thereby improving the overall life of the screen.
8. In the case of using the same dot pitch, the same constant current static, the same light-emitting chip, and the same chip in the whole screen, the cost of three-in-one and three-in-one is much more favorable.
9. From the packaging process, the package cost and production cost of the three-in-one are lower than the three-in-one.