The title of this article is how the "Student Party" is like. It is also not just a student party. It can be understood as "hands tight", "want to buy the most suitable one for you," and "want to buy the most cost-effective product." Write this article also want to find a place to "tap", "vent", and communicate with you about their own ideas The nonsense is a bit more. This article focuses on the experience of purchasing a second lens . Now it has been more than two years since the 5200 started. It has been 24 hours since the start of the second lens, and has risen a lot in two years, although it is empty. There is a "competence" but there is no way to display it. To say that there is no money, of course I know how good the 750 picture quality, but no money, ah, according to their own conditions, the second rule of the purchase of the lens can not exceed 4,000, Well, this is a hard indicator! In fact, even if it is 4,000, there are many choices. Take a picture of yourself and find that you don't use telephoto, and you have to decisively abandon the telephoto. The first choice is the 35mm focal length, which is 135 frames to be 50mm. Use, some time ago still think that 50 will be too long, ah well on the 35mm, he checked on the Internet, selected several: Sigma 30mm 1.4 Sigma 35 1.4 Sigma 18-35 1.8  Sigma 17-50 2.8 Nikon 35 1.8ed Dragon 35 1.8  The lens can't really read this thing. The more we look at it, the more we see it. At that time, it was really all sorts of tangles. Later, the local classmates who used to play the whole thing helped me to make a choice. First of all, we eliminated Sigma 18-35 and 35 1.4. The reason is that it is too heavy. When we combine my situation, I usually go out and play. When I travel with a camera, I think several times of experience. , 18-35 has 810g, 35 1.4 has more than 900 grams! The camera was more than 400 grams. Using my classmates' words to say, "Heavily top-heavy, so unbearable," the neck will be folded. Although the imaging is very good, but it's still not convenient! Sigma 12-24 4-5.6 Turi 11-20 2.8 11-16 2.8 12-28 4 These five This is the homework I did the day before I bought the camera. At that time, I also negotiated with the parents and agreed to buy it. I will also add these five items to the store and have a look! The next day in the store, the boss’s words helped me make a choice (although it was an unflattering boss). First Tu Li did not sell it, the entire equipment city did not, and Tu Li was not good. Then I did it. Just can find a reason not to buy Tu Li (more than 3,000 it) mainly tangled in Sigma 10-20 or 12-24, both a full-width one and a half, the boss said, what camera with what lens, although now looking at 12- 24 is very good, very eye-catching, but once you have a career or something, you have a full-range, will not take a look at the head of this 3000, their choice must be a big three or something like that, when their own Thoughts will also change. I think it makes sense! After all, people are selling this, certainly better than I understand! This time it was a real decision. It was 10-20 for Shima. Oh, he said that he wasn't honest because he sold me the price of the second generation (Sima 10-20 points). These two are really like ! Almost the same appearance, immediately paid when I discovered that the aperture parameters wrong, and later changed one, start! 2400 price, okay! Let me talk about the lens effect, never used super wide-angle before, the first feeling is a great deformation ah! (Maybe it's too cheap for me?) When the test shot was a super-sunny day, the sun was dead, and the color of the photo was just that. . Very low saturation, I do not know if I should choose a weather that is not so sunny to audition. These are the ones I have tuned, not only tuned but also tuned. The computer screen is not good. It is only on the phone that the saturation is too high. Ah, 2550 into the new lens, this semester will not buy any big things, and this is to urge me to go out and walk, can not be fair to the camera, ah, bought the lens in a good mood, life is always good! Super wide angle really cool! HuiZhou Superpower Technology Co.,Ltd. , https://www.spchargers.com
I am a student and I like "the science and technology brought to life". I say so because I play a lot. Sometimes I sigh, "Wow, how good is this picture," "Wow, this voice is too shocking. "How can I take such a good-looking picture?" Well, so I probably know it all. Now it's nothing more than photography, music and GTX.
Well, back to photography, maybe my current level can only be called "camera". The body is the D5200. It was quite fire in 14 years. It was just a white equipment. It was my first SLR, and I thought about it. At first, I didn't even buy a camera in a certain east but I still lost 618. I lost a lot of wow. I bought pictures of myself and I went to school to take pictures. The techniques and postures were also accumulating. At that time, I wanted to take photos of blurred backgrounds. , Found that how can not shoot out, before we know how to read the parameters, into the first lens 50 1.8G, 50 results are good 
The classmate recommended it was 17-50, and was later ruled out by himself. The reason was still his own fixed feelings. I felt that the camera should be fixed focus, holding a very comfortable, people should walk around, er, so it is estimated that the future The whole frame still plays fixed focus.
I like this engineering man is still more evaluation, there is a site DxO should know, a dedicated camera lens evaluation site, I also learned from this top of the Tamron 35 1.8, and now it is and Nikon 35, Sigma 30 compared , I thought for myself, or feel that Tamron is more appropriate, the first look at the price, a few hundred dollars worse, and Tamron lens score is still high, almost and Sigma 35 almost, Nikon's 35 and it is bad After 10 points, it is necessary to have a grade difference. Think about how you will upgrade the whole range later. You should buy a full-width head. And in the case that the price difference between Tenglong and the original factory is a few hundred, Tamron's imaging is very good. The key is the appearance. Also good-looking, ah, more than 400 grams of weight, but not sinking pressure, unlike Sigma more than 900 grams, after I have a full range of estimates will also choose this, so set, on the dragon 35mm 1.8 it!
If you think that this is the end of the story, then oh, people, one day, one idea, and after one day, I think, why should I buy 35, even if I want to change the full width, it will be two or three years later, if I have The 35,50 certainly will be white, certainly will not use 50, so a little loss ah, think about making a sister paper with 50, take a daily routine, in fact, still a bad shot of the scenery ah! So he began to study super-wide!
In the price of 4000 blocks, there is not much choice in the ultra wide:
Sigma 10-20 3.5
This lens: feel really good, ah, look at the map and feel really two concepts on the Internet, buy a lens must take a look at their own experience, look at the picture on the Internet with plastic like, in fact feel great, more than 500 grams The weight is very heavy but it is not heavy, it is 82mm UV mirror is a bit expensive! 
PS: This article has almost exactly the same in the last word, that is what I wrote! Otherwise, I can have these photos, right (no matter what the picture above is), and then attach the homework of two shots, and then recommend a website "what is worth buying" (is this site). The history of low prices, so that there is probably a price of the heart of the standard, ah, just sauce! 
